Times staff writer
A new congressional
report endorses the idea of buying heavy-lift airships instead of cargo
jets to get troops and equipment to future wars.
In a report looking at options for
strategic lift, the Congressional Budget Office says airships, such as the
Walrus program that is in its initial development stages, “would be
virtually independent of air bases and would be well suited to deliver
combat-ready troops, along with their vehicles and other equipment,
directly to their destinations.”
The Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency, DARPA, awarded two contracts in August for the first phase of
Walrus development. The idea, if it works, is to have a hybrid airship
capable of carrying 500 tons over 6,000 miles within a week, without
refueling.
The Walrus is not a traditional blimp.
It would use a combination of lighter-than-air or almost lighter-than-air
characteristics, along with an airfoil-shaped hull that would provide
additional lift. The aircraft also could have wings.
CBO, a nonpartisan analytical arm of
Congress, likes the heavy-lift airship concept because it could do more
than the airlift aircraft and surge sealift capabilities currently used
when U.S. forces deploy.
“Delivering fully equipped units
straight to their destination would reduce the time that units typically
spend between arriving in a theater and beginning operations,” the report
says. “Although not as prompt as conventional aircraft, hybrid airships
could still begin arriving in the Persian Gulf region from the United
States in about five days, assuming that the units they transported were
ready for loading immediately.”
Fifteen airships could deliver 1,000
tons of cargo a day, three times as much as a fleet of 21 C-17
Globemasters, the report says.
Developing and buying 14 to 16 airships
and operating them for 30 years would cost about $11.3 billion, the report
says.
There are downsides to heavy airships,
the report says. A big disadvantage is that they are vulnerable to
antiaircraft fire because they fly lower and slower than traditional cargo
aircraft.
Those characteristics also might lead
some nations to deny overflight rights they might grant to other, swifter
aircraft.